Twitter Videos
Twitter Followers video compilations - Page 45
 |
President Obama took questions in a Town Hall event using ... Posted by: TheYoungTurks
Video duration: 373 seconds Global video hits: 17819 President Obama took questions in a Town Hall event using Tweets. Michael Shure breaks down some highlights. The Largest Online News Show in the World. Facebook: www.facebook.com Subscribe: bit.ly TYT Mobile: bit.ly Twitter: twitter.com www.theyoungturks.co m FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com Read Ana's blog and subscribe at: www.examiner.com Read Cenk's Blog: www.huffingtonpost.c om Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![So there\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zKRJHUN1AUA/2.jpg "So there\") |
So there's this boy named Justin Bieber Posted by: lOcAlGrLiEe123
Video duration: 376 seconds Global video hits: 89427 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Why Facebook Fans are important? Posted by: turnkeyfans
Video duration: 84 seconds Global video hits: 181223 www.TurnKeyFans.com showcases why Facebook fans are important, highlighting popular social media marketing facts. Turn Key Fans provides fans, followers, views, likes, connections and subscribers to all major social media networks. Affordable, trust worthy, safe with quick turnaround times. www.facebook.com/tur nkeylikes www.twitter.com/turn keyfans www.turnkeyfans.com Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Twouble with Twitters: SuperNews! Posted by: Current
Video duration: 268 seconds Global video hits: 2641833 A young man struggles against the pressure to Twitter his life away. Watch more SuperNews! www.current.com www.facebook.com VIEW more SuperNews! clips & SUBSCRIBE to the YouTube Playlist here... www.youtube.com Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
Twitter How To With www.twitteringsoftwareandmarketing.com Posted by: adscantwo
Video duration: 269 seconds Global video hits: 6791 www.twitteringsoftwa reandmarketing.com and twitter how to. Learn various techniques on how to best take advantage of twitter. Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
 |
How to Do Wholesale Deals with Real Estate Agents, Part 2 Posted by: TheRealEstateDealer
Video duration: 351 seconds Global video hits: 1425 www.therealestatedea ler.com - Part 2 - You have to show a level of professionalism when trying to flip real estate deals with real estate agents. We will show you how to get started. If you like this video, share it with your Twitter followers by going to www.bit.ly real estate property... Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
| Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 |
Twitter vows to 'protect' users
Posted on: May 15, 2012, 2:22 am
Twitter tells the BBC it hopes to work more closely with government and other policymakers. read more ...
Twitter agrees to adopt Do-Not-Track privacy option
Posted on: May 17, 2012, 6:38 pm
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Twitter will honour requests from users who do not want their online behaviour tracked, the company said on Thursday, in contrast with Web companies such Google Inc and Facebook Inc whose business models rely heavily on collecting user data. Twitter said it will officially support "Do Not Track," a standardized privacy initiative that has been heavily promoted by the U ... read more ...
Pakistan restores access to Twitter
Posted on: May 20, 2012, 10:30 pm
Pakistan restored access to Twitter after briefly blocking the microblog over "blasphemous" posts about a Facebook competition involving caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed. read more ...
Twitter restored in Pakistan after block over Muhammad images - Wikinews
Posted on: May 23, 2012, 12:14 am
The Pakistani government has temporarily blocked social networking website Twitter in relation to posts on the site promoting a Facebook contest involving drawings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. The block was reportedly lifted after a few ... read more ...
Arrest made in Twitter site case - Hattiesburg American
Posted on: May 23, 2012, 12:00 am
A Starkville man has been arrested on charges of impersonating a police officer after Starkville police said he had established a fake account on the social media site Twitter. The Commercial Dispatch reports William Koal McMillan, 19, was ... read more ...
Australian Twitter addicts wanted for QUT study - Daily Telegraph
Posted on: May 22, 2012, 11:32 pm
If so, Queensland researcher Helen Partridge wants to hear all about it - and not just via Twitter. The QUT professor is seeking Aussie Twitter addicts for a study on how and why the platform is used, other than for work and study. Prof Partridge began the ... read more ...
Latest comments made on this video:
By: egga31. on 17 Aug 11, 06:44:09
RON PAUL? 2012!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
By: whitemanwaydownsouth. on 30 Jul 11, 10:28:58
obama is disappointed to? lose 30000 followers on twitter because he is spamming them with his terrible ideas, imagine how disappointed in 2012 when he finds out how many voters he has lost. epic fail mr president, epic fail!!!
By: andrewsaccount09. on 13 Jul 11, 00:40:46
Good story, and could TYT please treat widescreen videos like they're widescreen now that the show is? in HD?
By: mspy01. on 11 Jul 11, 22:02:31
Business friendly government? First- we had a "business friendly government" under George W.? and that lead to the large deficit, largest lost of jobs created in America, and this current state of economy. Second- The Republicans promised to improve the economy through their plans, but the recovery rate is a lot slower now since last year. Third- There are pending bills that they refuse to pass to boost jobs. Last- the republicans want to hurt Obama at the expense of the economy.
By: Bushiey. on 11 Jul 11, 19:59:46
uh, what??
By: WrathOfNolla. on 11 Jul 11, 17:34:18
thank you? for proving my point.
By: Brandonduboff. on 11 Jul 11, 17:08:00
me?? hahahaha. stop making things up
By: WrathOfNolla. on 11 Jul 11, 17:01:45
aka, you were simply grasping at straws because Michael Savage or Mark Levin told you? to.
By: Newenlightenmentnow. on 11 Jul 11, 07:10:17
I was commenting on how you were so butt? hurt over the fact that I may have insulted you. You started by insulting me. So don't get all butt hurt when I insult you back.
By: HeavyWaterAtoll. on 11 Jul 11, 04:54:48
Cool. Thanks? for answering honestly, you don't know shit about it.
By: Bushiey. on 11 Jul 11, 01:55:18
What??
By: Newenlightenmentnow. on 10 Jul 11, 23:36:32
You brought this on yourself. You opened by insulting my knowledge of the american political landscape with exactly zero knowledge of what I have read. You get over yourself fucktard! Here's my impression of a Ron Paul libertarian. Hey guys you know how we dismantled all regulation? preventing the banks from behaving illegally? Wouldn't it be cool if we dismantled it even further and just "trust the markets" to be the watch dog. And you call me naive. Magic thinking at it's worst!
By: Newenlightenmentnow. on 10 Jul 11, 23:33:03
Second point. I'm not satisfied with President Obama, but my guess is you skipped over that? either on purpose, or you're illiterate. Either way, I don't care to speculate. I'm dissatisfied with Obama mainly because he has extended the patriot act, but unlike Bush, I can point to some things Obama has done right. Repeal of DADT, repeal of the federal ban on stem cell research, withdrawling from Iraq (i would prefer faster). Some of the health care bill is good.
By: Newenlightenmentnow. on 10 Jul 11, 23:30:13
Yes I have heard of Ron Paul. He's a well meaning fool. He may be right about the wars, but his economic policies would be an absolute disaster. Austrian economics papers are rarely published in peer reviewed journals because they lack scientific rigor. Ron Paul can write all the books he likes, but until he submits his ideas for peer review, his opinion on economics is no more credible than a burger flipper's is? on brain surgery.
By: CognosSquare. on 10 Jul 11, 22:36:20
good night my friend. Maybe we continue this another day. It seems we dont disagree on the methods but we both want a good system. It has been fascinating but this discussion has become choppy and difficult to overview. This is underlined by both you and me restating? earlier points. 'till we meet again.
By: CognosSquare. on 10 Jul 11, 22:11:49
Again I dont know about govt track record in USA in regards to owning. Here we have govt ownership in some companies. Especially Nuclear power. It has worked fine. No company would make the huge investment of building a plant in the 70ies when we needed a lot of energy fast. It? was not a very controversial decision. True it was probably made more expensive by very strict regulation. But we did not want a Harrisburg (or a Chernobyl/Fukushima).
By: romanmir01. on 10 Jul 11, 22:07:34
I gotta go to sleep. 75 million should be adjusted alright. To no liability limits, so that energy? production takes into account the possible liability and doesn't create the moral hazard, as all gov't laws do. If 'democratic' elections decide something, then it's mobocracy - tyranny of majority, but yes, if majority of people agree with your views, then you have achieved basic public consensus, and there is no point in legislation. Good night for real.
By: CognosSquare. on 10 Jul 11, 22:01:32
very interesting. The 75 million cap there does not seem right. The punishment should fit the crime even though it means bankruptcy. That should be adjusted. My point was never that the regulations are always fair, and Id happily admit that some are insane. Especially in USA. Building a? pool in California is apparently needlessly a nightmare. I dont see how I am a tyrant. The policies are decided by proxy of democratic election.
By: romanmir01. on 10 Jul 11, 21:57:01
Your example doesn't work for gov't protectionist scams, like FDA. Here is something: The FDA concluded: "high fructose [corn] syrup is as safe for use in food as sucrose, corn sugar, corn syrup and invert sugar."1 The ILSI Expert Panel concluded, "fructose is a valuable,? traditional source of food energy, and there is no basis for recommending increases or decreases in its use in the general food supply or in special dietary use products." Problem: watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
By: romanmir01. on 10 Jul 11, 21:52:59
And if you have any employees, then you are ABSOLUTELY regulated, regardless of? your business. In USA for example, there are all sorts of regulations that kick in once you go over certain size limit, so if you go over 5 people, you have to pay payroll, if you go over 50, you'll have to provide various things, like special privileges, maternity leaves, health benefits, etc.etc., who knows? Beside which there is always minimum wage and other labor laws. So don't be so sure at all.
By: CognosSquare. on 10 Jul 11, 21:51:59
I dont want to overpay for food either. But lets make the case of the "Red Bull that is addictive like heroin". Let call it "supercola". Its marketed to kids. It uses deceptive marketing. It secretly eats your brain over 10? year but you feel great. Do you really want despondent people in the streets, supercola rehab centers, supercola killing sprees, supercola billions in profit. Man, its just needless loss of manhours and suffering. Or you nip it in the bud. Govt shuts it down.
By: romanmir01. on 10 Jul 11, 21:51:12
Oh, and by the way, you think regulations don't apply to your IT business? Just wait until you step on the toes of somebody, who works for a large corporation, who deals with gov't, who create all sorts of regulations. You'll? find yourself violating patents at least, if not copyrights (probably not), but patents and maybe something else, like trade agreements, likely you write something off your income that's at least 'gray' area, etc.etc. Don't be so sure.
By: romanmir01. on 10 Jul 11, 21:49:19
there are no businesses where regulations by government is a good idea or are 'needed'. Regulations by the market is all that's needed, as market? is the actual regulator in all cases. Of-course gov't skews the market, then the market fails due to the fight between the real market and gov't regulated market, but they blame the free market for the failure, not recognizing that it was not the free market, but the mis-allocation of resources by gov't regulations. Good night.
By: CognosSquare. on 10 Jul 11, 21:42:10
if we needed more food the prices would go up and the industry would resurge. Of course. To make this clear. Im not arguing for a some weird govt controlled market. Im arguing for not abolishing regulations. They are needed and needs to be carefully maintained. I have my own IT company and I have spent less than 1 minute thinking about regulations in my line of work. We sell our services and pay our taxes. But i? recognize that in other industries some regulations are needed.
By: romanmir01. on 10 Jul 11, 21:42:06
Gov't shouldn't own any assets. It can't own, it doesn't have concept of ownership, it can't care and it doesn't. Only private owner cares. His neighbors care. Neighbors of their neighbors care. This is all about private? property rights and liability, which is limited by the gov't, that's what BP case is about, not about regulations, which were all in place, but the regulators had a good time with coke on toaster ovens and various sexual acts.